ALL ALERTS
EXPERIMENTATION
COMPANION
FOOD-AGRICULTURE
WILD
ENTERTAINMENT
FASHION
WIN › Med Schools End Live Labs
human-relevant models replace animals
VICTORY: Medical Schools End Animal Labs. Thank you Kinship Circle activists! Together, we pressured medical schools to drop animal labs from their curriculums. Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine, a nonprofit representing over 12,000 physicians, confirms that all medical schools surveyed in the United States and Canada no longer train students with live animals. University of Tennessee, the final school to switch from animal use to human-applicable training, now imparts skills and knowledge related to human patients.
Med Schools Upgrade To Human-Focused Instruction 6/24/16 »PCRM Press Release. WASHINGTON: Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine announces that University of Tennessee, the last remaining school to use animals, now joins all programs in the U.S. and Canada in using human-relevant training methods like advanced medical simulators. John Pippin, M.D., F.A.C.C., director of academic affairs at PCRM says: “With the decision by leaders at the University of Tennessee College of Medicine to eliminate animal use in the Surgical Skills Laboratory, we are entering the post-animal era in medical student education. Like Johns Hopkins University a month before and numerous other medical schools before that, the University of Tennessee has acknowledged that simulation and other nonanimal teaching methods supplant the cruel and unnecessary use of live animals in training physicians.”
PCRM identified a need to modernize medical education and began work on the issue in 1985. Previously, medical schools used dogs, pigs, and other animals to teach physiology, pharmacology, and surgical skills. Students were instructed to inject animals with various drugs to monitor responses and/or make incisions into an animal's abdomen to insert lighted cameras and surgical instruments. After a training session, animals were killed. Now, all medical students trained in the U.S. receive an education based on human anatomy and physiology, giving new doctors skills to care for human patients. The last 10 medical schools to switch from animals to human-relevant methods are:
University of Tennessee
Johns Hopkins University
Rush Medical College
University of Mississippi
Oregon Health & Science University
Uniformed Services University
University of Virginia
Medical College of Wisconsin
Memorial University of Newfoundland
University of Wisconsin
Classroom Animal Experiments Are Unwarranted Interactive Simulators Work Better. Computerized simulators emulate human anatomy and key facets of patient care. Animal-free teaching tools are more cost effective and facilitate applicative learning about human health and safety. Simulators, unlike dogs or pigs, allow students to learn at their own pace and repeat procedures as many times as necessary. Still, schools such as Medical College of Wisconsin used dogs and pigs in physiology labs. In one drill (now shut down) students work with anesthetized and intubated dogs. During a five-hour procedure, they connect a shaved dog to a computer via intravenous probes to observe the animal's pulse. They then expose the dog's heart (with scalpels and bone saws), inject chemicals, shock the heart with electrical paddles, and maneuver it by hand. Students who gain knowledge in an animal lab like this must unlearn much of it down the road. Incision pressure varies between dogs and humans. Size, location, texture and elasticity of internal organs are also vastly in incongruous. In fact, each species is so diverse in terms of anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and genetics that animal studies have endangered humans with misleading data.
6/5/12 »Medical College Of Wisconsin's Physiology Curriculum Goes Animal-Free! After a sordid history of dog and pig labs, MCW switches to human-relevant simulators. Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine intends to monitor university claims since MCW “retained the option to reinstitute animal use in later years.” Kinship Circle, together with PCRM and others, logged lots of objections to MCW animal labs. Activists pressured MCW's Dean and Physiology Chair to replace animals with human-based teaching tools. But rather than upgrade, MCW substituted dogs with pigs. Persistent demands prompted MCW to stop pig use and try a computer-based system. Still, the school used rabbits, frogs and rats in procedures. We are on standby in case MCW backslides!
ORIGINAL ALERT CLOSEDArchived as a writing template
Dear Dean Dunn and Dr. Cowley,
Two decades ago, medical schools enlisted dogs for the study of physiology, pharmacology, and surgery. Today, only Louisiana State University, New York Medical College and Medical College of Wisconsin offer live dog labs. Of 125 medical schools accredited by the Association of American Medical Colleges, at least 100 no longer use any nonhuman species to train medical students.
I respectfully ask Medical College of Wisconsin to terminate its old-fashioned dog labs. I urge you to replace all animal experiments with human-focused teaching tools.
In a lab drill that recently concluded, students work with anesthetized and intubated dogs during a five-hour procedure. They connect a shaved dog to a computer via intravenous probes and observe the animal's pulse. They then expose the dog's heart, using scalpels and bone saws, to inject chemicals, shock the heart with electrical paddles, and maneuver it by hand. Upon completion, each of 52 dogs is killed with a high dose of potassium. The school actually keeps spare dogs in stock, in case lab dogs die before their ordeal ends.
Obvious humane concerns have prompted the discovery of scientific systems to replace animal models entirely. Non-animal tools are typically more cost-effective and supply data relevant to human health questions and educational needs. Trauma training, for example, is now generally conducted with simulators that are less expensive than animal studies and
crafted to emulate key facets of patient care. Human simulators, unlike dogs, let students learn at their own pace and repeat procedures as many times as necessary.
Students who gain knowledge in dog labs, on the other hand, have to unlearn results down the road. Incision pressure varies between dogs and humans. Size, location, texture and elasticity of internal organs are also vastly in incongruous. In fact, each species is so diverse in terms of anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and genetics — animal studies have endangered humans with misleading data. Certainly, one-time practice on a dog is irrelevant at best.
Moreover, researchers cannot separate the effects of stress hormones in animals from the disease, drug or surgery under analysis. Findings published in Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science (Autumn 2004) reveal animals display quantifiable stress reactions to routine laboratory practices. These stress effects can influence the researcher's understanding of scientific discovery.
Finally, the issue of “random source” dogs deserves your serious consideration. Ken Schroeder, the USDA Random Source Class B Animal Dealer who supplies the College with dogs, has been cited 16 times for failure to permit inspectors onto his property. USDA records attest to Schroeder's ailing animals and shoddy sheltering conditions.
With the multitude of viable human-relevant options now available, animal labs are simply no longer warranted in medical school training.
ORIGINAL ALERT CLOSEDArchived as a writing template
ORIGINAL CONTACTS RETRIEVED IN 2012 Michael J. Dunn, Dean (now deceased)
Medical College of Wisconsin
8701 Watertown Plank Rd / Milwaukee, WI 53226
414-456-8213 ▪ mdunn@mcw.edu
Allen W. Cowley Jr., Ph.D., Chair of Physiology
Medical College of Wisconsin
9701 Watertown Plank Rd / Milwaukee, WI 53226
414-456-8277 ▪ Cowley@mcw.edu
about web petitions
When you use the web petition instead of direct-send, your comments — and everyone else's — come from one place: Our website server.
WEB PETITIONS REQUIRE THE LEAST EFFORT, BUT SOMETIMES CAN:
Create a spam effect that angers recipients and hurts outcome for animals.
Compel recipients to block the entire petition, so no one's comments get through.
Your tax-deductible gift pays to develop learning initiatives and mass print literature for educators, advocates, students… Together, we can spread the truth about animals!
DISCLAIMERInformation in these materials is verified with original source. Kinship Circle does not assume responsibility for
accuracy
of information or for consequences of its use. Nothing on this website intends to encourage illegal action in whatever
country you
are reading it in. Kinship Circle does not engage in, nor support, any form of harassment or unlawful action. Nothing in this
alert
serves to promote such conduct.
DIGITAL ADDRESSESKinship Circle does not guarantee validity of digital addresses. Recipients may change or disable their emails
and/or social media. Government, corporate or other websites may be outdated or incorrect.
DISCLAIMER: Information in these materials is verified with original source. Kinship Circle does not assume responsibility for accuracy of information or for consequences of its use. Nothing on this website intends to encourage illegal action in whatever country you are reading it in. Kinship Circle does not engage in, nor support, any form of harassment or unlawful action. Nothing in this alert serves to promote such conduct.
EMAIL ADDRESSES: Kinship Circle cannot guarantee validity of email addresses. During a campaign, recipients may change or disable their email addresses. Email addresses obtained from government or other official websites may be outdated or incorrect.
Kinship Circle is a nonprofit focused in: Animal Cruelty Investigation & Action, Humane Education, and Disaster Animal Response.
● Federal 501c3 under U.S. IRS ruling, Public Charity Status: 170b1Avi
● Tax Employee Identification Number (EIN) available upon request
● Nonprofit Certificate of Incorporation, Charter: N00071626
● PRIVACY POLICY